FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF
CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of
a Complaint by FINAL
DECISION
Richard R.
Olson,
Complainant
against Docket #FIC 86-315
Executive
Director and Director of Personnel Services, Board of Trustees for State
Technical Colleges, Norwalk State Technical College, Presidential Search
Committee,
Respondents February 25, 1987
The above-captioned matter was heard
as a contested case on December 18, 1986, at which time the complainant and the
respondents appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony,
exhibits and argument on the complaint.
After consideration of the entire
record, the following facts are found:
1.
The respondents are public agencies within the meaning of 1-18a(a),
G.S.
2.
By letter dated October 31, 1986 the complainant made a request of the
respondent executive director for copies of the resumes of the candidates for
president of Norwalk State Technical College, who were not finalists for the
position. The complainant indicated in
his letter of request that any personally identifiable information contained
therein may be masked or otherwise deleted.
3.
By letter dated November 7, 1986 the respondent executive director
denied the complainant's request.
4.
By letter of complaint filed with the Commission on November 17, 1986
the complainant appealed the denial of his request.
Docket #FIC
86-315
Page 2
5.
The complainant requested that the Commission impose a civil penalty
against the respondents.
6.
At the hearing before the Commission, the respondents moved to dismiss
the complaint on the basis of res judicata and collateral estoppel.
7.
Specifically, the respondents claim that in July, 1986 the complainant
brought a similar complaint before the Commission in docket #FIC 86-212 and
that the final decision in that case is conclusive upon both parties named in
this action and precludes the complainant from filing any subsequent appeals
with the Commission, concerning the records in question.
8.
It is found that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel
do not apply to the facts of this case.
9.
The respondents' motion to dismiss is therefore denied.
10.
The respondents again moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to
1-21i(b), G.S., claiming the appeal was not filed with the Commission within the statutory
time period.
11.
It is found that the complainant's appeal was filed with the Commission
within 30 days of the respondent executive director's denial, in accordance
with 1-21i(b), G.S.
12.
The respondents' motion is therefore dismissed.
13.
It is found that the resumes of the unsuccessful candidates for the
position of president of Norwalk State Technical College are public records as
defined by 1-18a(d), G.S.
14.
It is also found, however, that the names, addresses and other
personally identifiable information contained in the resumes of unsuccessful
candidates, whose identities were not announced publicly, are exempt from
mandatory disclosure under 1-19(b)(2), G.S.
15.
The Commission declines to impose a civil penalty against the
respondents as requested by the complainant.
Docket
#FIC86-315
Page 3
The following order by the
Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the
above-captioned complaint:
1.
The respondents shall forthwith provide the complainant with the resumes
of the unsuccessful candidates for the position of president of Norwalk State
Technical College.
2.
In complying with paragraph 1 of this order, the respondents may mask or
otherwise delete from such resumes, names, addresses and any other information
which would personally identify the
unsuccessful candidates.
Approved by order of the Freedom of
Information Commission at its regular meeting of February 25, 1987.
ÿ
Karen J.
Haggett
Clerk of the Commission