FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a Complaint
by FINAL
DECISION
Robert McCloud,
Complainant
against Docket
#FIC 87-145
State of Connecticut Board
of Parole and the Chairman, State of Connecticut Board of Parole,
Respondents December
15, 1987
The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case
on June 25, 1987, at which time the complainant and the respondent appeared and
presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.
After consideration of the entire record, the following
facts are found:
1. The respondent
is a public agency within the meaning of §1-18a(a), G.S.
2. On May 6,
1987, the complainant requested that the respondent provide him with
transcripts of the parole hearings which it held concerning the complainant and
his former wife.
3. On May 13,
1987 the complainant filed his appeal with the Freedom of Information
Commission alleging he had not received the requested transcripts.
4. The respondent
claimed that the transcripts of the hearings were exempt under §§1-19(b)(2) and
1-19(b)(3)(E), G.S.
5. The requested
transcripts are records of proceedings of the respondent concerning whether or
not to grant parole to the complainant and his former wife, who were codefendants
convicted of charges of sexual assault and risk of injury to a minor.
6. It is found
that the victims of the crimes committed by the complainant and his former wife
were their children.
7. It is found
that the respondent failed to prove that the transcripts of the parole hearings
were exempt from disclosure under either §§1-19(b)(2) or 1-19(b)(3)(D), G.S.
Docket #FIC 87-145 Page
two
8. It is found that the complainant's former
wife had received anonymous threatening letters which she believes came from
him.
9. It is found that one of the complainant's
children is afraid of him, and fears that the complainant will seek him out.
10. Under the circumstances of this case the
Commission declines to issue an order which would disclose material which would
identify, or help the complainant locate the victims of the complainant's
crimes.
11. The Commission further declines to issue an
order which would disclose the transcript of the parole hearing of the
complainant's former wife.
The
following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the
record concerning the above-captioned complaint.
1. The respondent shall disclose to the
complainant the transcript of his own parole hearing. However, the respondent shall delete from the requested record
all material which would identify, or help the complainant locate the victims
of the complainant's crimes.
Approved
by order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its special meeting of
December 15, 1987.
Catherine
H. Lynch
Acting
Clerk of the Commission