FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a Complaint
by FINAL
DECISION
Adelaide Kagan,
Complainant
against Docket
#FIC 88-9
State of Connecticut
Department of Human Resources,
Respondent May
25, 1988
The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case
on February 25, 1988, at which time the complainant and the respondent
appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and
argument on the complaint.
After consideration of the entire record, the following
facts are found:
1. The
respondent is a public agency within the meaning of §1-18a(a), G.S.
2. The
complainant is a family day care provider registered with the respondent.
3. On or
about March 5, 1987 a representative of the respondent made an unannounced
visit to the complainant's home to investigate an allegation of child
abuse. Such allegation had been
forwarded to the respondent by the State of Connecticut Department of Children
and Youth Services ("DCYS").
4. Following
an investigation, the respondent notified the complainant that it would take no
"negative action" against the complainant's family day care
registration. There ensued a series of
requests by the complainant to the respondent for information concerning the
basis of the respondent's investigation.
5. The
request upon which this appeal is based was dated December 12, 1987 and in it
the complainant made a request of the respondent for a copy of the
inter-departmental communication between DCYS and the respondent, received on
March 3, 1987, that led to the unannounced visit to the complainant's home on
March 5, 1987.
Docket #FIC 88-9 Page
Two
6. By letter
dated December 15, 1987 the respondent acknowledged receipt of the
request. By letter dated December 16,
1987 the respondent denied the request, citing §17-38a(g), G.S.
7. By letter
of complaint filed with the Commission on January 6, 1988 the complainant
appealed the denial of her request.
8. Section
17-38a(b), G.S. requires certain health care professionals and others to report
suspected child abuse to DCYS.
9. Section
17-38a(g), G.S. provides that such reports "and any other information
relative to child abuse, wherever located," shall be confidential.
10. It is
found that the inter-departmental communication which is the subject of this
complaint is "information relative to child abuse" within the meaning
of §17-38a(g), G.S.
11. It is
further found that §17-38a(g), G.S. exempts the requested record from mandatory
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.
12. It is
concluded that the respondent did not violate §§1-15 or 1-19(a), G.S. when it
failed to provide the complainant with access to inspect or copy the
inter-departmental communication referred to at paragraph 5, above.
The following order by the Commission is hereby
recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned
complaint.
1. The
complaint is hereby dismissed.
Approved by order of the Freedom of Information
Commission at its special meeting of May 25, 1988.
Catherine
H. Lynch
Acting
Clerk of the Commission