FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a Complaint
by FINAL
DECISION
Carole Casapulla,
Complainant,
against Docket
#FIC 88-313
Regional Director of Region
5, State of Connecticut Department of Mental Retardation,
Respondent Janaury
25, 1989
The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case
on September 20, 1988, at which time the complainant and the respondent
appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and
argument on the complaint.
After consideration of the entire record, the following
facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:
1. The respondent
is a public agency within the meaning of §1-18a(a), G.S.
2. By letter
dated July 29, 1988 and filed with the Commission on August 1, 1988, the
complainant appealed to the Commission, alleging the respondent failed to
comply fully with the Commission's order in Docket #FIC 87-339.
3. The Commission
takes administrative notice of the fact that the notice of final decision in
Docket #FIC 87-339 was mailed to the respondent on May 18, 1988.
4. It is found
that, pursuant to the Commission's order in Docket #FIC 87-339, the respondent
has provided the complainant with some three thousand pieces of paper requiring
over one hundred hours of personnel time to compile and photocopy.
5. It is found
that at the time of this hearing on the issue of non-compliance the respondent
had provided the complainant almost all the records ordered disclosed and was
in the process of compiling and copying the rest of the records.
6. It is found
that the respondent also has created several documents which he did not have at
the time of the hearing in Docket #FIC 87-339 and was not ordered to produce.
Docket #FIC 88-313 Page
Two
7. It is
concluded that the respondent has indicated there was an effort to comply with
the Commission's order in Docket #FIC 87-339.
The following order by the Commission is hereby
recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned
complaint:
1. The complaint
is hereby dismissed.
2. The Commission
urges the respondent to continue working with the complainant to provide her
with detailed documentation of her son's care and to do so in a more timely
manner.
Approved by order of the Freedom of Information
Commission at its regular meeting of January 25, 1989.
Karen
J. Haggett
Clerk
of the Commission