FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a Complaint
by FINAL
DECISION
Steve Burkholder,
Complainant,
against Docket
#FIC 88-323
Commanding Officer of the
Public Affairs Unit, State of Connecticut Department of Public Safety, Division
of State Police and State of Connecticut Department of Public Safety, Division
of State Police,
Respondents May
10, 1989
The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case
on September 26, 1988, at which time the parties appeared and presented
evidence and testimony on the record.
After consideration of the entire record, the following
facts are found:
1. The
respondents are public agencies within the meaning of §1-18a(a), G.S.
2. By letter
of request dated July 8, 1988, the complainant asked for copies of all records,
including police photographs or videotapes or audiotapes, of the respondents
relating to:
(a) April 26, 1985, Middletown -- Speech by
Nation of Islam leader the Reverend Louis Farrakhan at Wesleyan University;
(b) October 26, 1987, Groton (city) --
Demonstration outside the gates of the Electric Boat shipyard to mark the 25th
anniversary of the Cuban Missile Crisis;
(c)
Dec. 13, 1986, Groton (city and town) -- Protest outside the Electric Boat
shipyard in Groton city on the date of the christening of the submarine USS
Tennessee. Following that, a march by
demonstrators to the U.S. Naval Submarine Base in the town of Groton. The marchers stopped at the southeastern
corner of the base before proceeding to the base's main gate, where the
procession ended in several arrests;
Docket #FIC 88-323 page
2
(d) January 1987, Brevard County (Cocoa
Beach/Cape Canaveral), Florida -- Large demonstration protesting the test
launching of the Trident D-5 missile.
The demonstration occurred on approximately January 9 through January
17, 1987.
3. In his
letter of request dated July 8, 1988, the complainant also requested all
records, including photographs or videotapes or audiotapes, relating to the
following groups: the Coalition to Stop
Trident; the Atlantic Life Community, the War Resisters League, Plowshares (or
Trident "Nein"), (Connecticut) Clergy and Laity Concerned, the
Connecticut Freeze Campaign (or Greater Hartford Freeze Campaign), Pledge of
Resistance, and the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador.
4. After the
respondents failed to respond to his request, the complainant filed his
complaint with the Commission on August 10, 1988.
5. It is
found that the records sought by the complainant could be maintained at the
Reports and Records Division, or the Criminal Intelligence Unit or the
Commissioner's office.
6. It is
found that the respondents asked both the Reports and Records Division and the
Criminal Intelligence Unit whether the records which the complainant seeks
exist in their files.
7. It is found
that the only records found by those offices, which are responsive to the
request of the complainant are two travel authorizations (Item 2d) and a 1987
incident report which consisted only of a number used for administration and
payroll.
8. At
hearing the respondents agreed to provide the complainant with travel
authorizations and the complainant
agreed that the names of the officers who traveled to Florida might be
deleted.
9. It found
that the respondents failed to comply with the complainant's request to the
extent that it failed to check the files in the Commissioner's office regarding
the items requested.
10. It is
found that the respondents failed to prove that any of the requested records
were exempt from disclosure pursuant to §1-19, G.S.
11. The
complainant claimed that since other similar
requests made in the 1980's had resulted in the disclosure of operations
plans and other memos relevant to state police
Docket #FIC 88-323 page
3
surveillance of protests and
demonstrations, that in response to his current request similar records should
be forthcoming.
12. The
complainant further claimed that the Legislative Hearings on State Police
Surveillance and Investigative Techniques conducted in January, 1985, revealed
that some police investigative files are never destroyed.
13. It is
found that the complainant witnessed state police videotaping the crowd at the
speech by the Reverend Louis Farrakhan at Wesleyan University in 1985.
14. It is
found that the respondents did not retain the videotapes taken at Wesleyan
University during the speech of Reverend Louis Farrakhan.
15. It is found
that records maintenance and destruction procedures of the state police have
changed since 1985.
16. It is
found that the respondents may have some files maintained under names and case
numbers of individuals who were arrested at the demonstrations in the city and
town of Groton.
17. It is
found that the complainant failed to request the files by the name of specific
individuals or by case number.
18. It is
concluded that pursuant to §1-15, G.S., et seq. the respondents
are not required to do research to obtain the names of individuals who were
arrested in connection with the matters with respect to which the complainant
seeks records.
19. It is
further found that, except for his failure to inquire in the Commissioner's
office, the respondents made a reasonable effort to comply with the
complainant's request.
The following order by the Commission is hereby
recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned
complaint.
1. The
respondents shall inquire at the office of the Commissioner of the State Police
whether any records requested by the complainant are retained in that office.
2. The
respondents shall provide the complainant with copies of records requested by
the complainant if such records are found in the office of the Commissioner of
State Police.
Approved by order of the Freedom of Information
Commission at its regular meeting of May 10, 1989.
Karen
J. Haggett
Clerk
of the Commission