FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a Complaint
by FINAL DECISION
Lorraine Tirella,
Complainant
against Docket
#FIC 94-427
Oxford Board of Education,
Respondent March 8, 1995
The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested
case on January 3, 1995, at which time the complainant and the respondent
appeared and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint. This matter was consolidated for hearing
with contested cases docket numbers FIC 94-339 and FIC 94-438.
After consideration of the entire record, the
following facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:
1. The
respondent is a public agency within the meaning of 1-18a(a), G.S.
2. By letter
of complaint filed with this Commission on December 9, 1994, the complainant
alleged that the respondent denied her access to public records in violation of
the provisions of the Freedom of Information ("FOI") Act.
3. It is
found that on December 6, 1994, the complainant requested of the respondent
access to records of its out-of-district educational fees. She did not seek any names or other
personally identifying information about any possible handicapped children.
4. It is also
found that on December 6, 1994, the complainant asked for access to attorney's
bills for October and November, 1994.
5. The
records identified in paragraphs 3 and 4, above, are public records within the
meaning of 1-18a(d), G.S.
6. It is
found that the complainant was told she could only have copies of the requested
records for which she must pay.
7. The
respondent claims that in cases where some information may be redacted prior to
the disclosure of requested records, they can require those seeking access to
pay for copies that are made by the respondent with appropriate redactions.
Docket #FIC 94-427 Page
2
8. It is
concluded that by imposing the requirement of payment for copies of public
records upon the complainant pursuant to 1-15(a), G.S., when the
complainant merely seeks access to public records pursuant to 1-19(a),
G.S., the respondent has violated the provisions of 1-19(a), G.S.
The following order by the Commission is hereby
recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned
complaint.
1. Henceforth
the respondent shall strictly comply with the disclosure provisions of
1-19(a), G.S.
2. This
Commission suggests to the respondent that unfettered access to public
information sought in the instant case can be accomplished not only by the
respondent making and keeping on hand properly redacted copies, but also by
implementing a non-personally identifying coding system so as not to disclose
the names or addresses of individuals whose identity may be kept confidential.
Approved by Order of the
Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of March 8, 1995.
Debra L. Rembowski
Clerk of the
Commission
Docket #FIC 94-427 Page
3
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c),
G.S. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING
ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR
THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED
CASE ARE:
LORRAINE TIRELLA
11 Larkey Road
Oxford, CT 06478
OXFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION
c/o Donald F. Houston, Esq.
Durant, Nichols, Houston,
Mitchell & Sheahan, P.C.
1000 Lafayette Boulevard
P.O. Box 351
Bridgeport, CT 06601-0351
Debra L. Rembowski
Clerk of the
Commission