FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION

OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

 

 

In the Matter of a Complaint by                                                Final Decision

 

Karen A. Massaro,

 

                        Complainant,

 

            against                                                                          Docket #FIC 1996-013

 

Allingtown Board of Fire Commissioners,

 

                        Respondent,                                                     September 25, 1996

 

 

            The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on July 11, 1996, at which time the complainant and the respondent appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.

 

            After consideration of the entire record, the following facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:

 

1.     The respondent is a public agency within the meaning of §1-18a(a), G.S.

 

2.  By letter of complaint dated January 5, 1996, and filed with the Commission on January 11, 1996, the complainant alleged that the respondent violated the Freedom of Information (“FOI”) Act by discussing resumes, including hers, for the position of secretary/treasurer in executive session on January 2, 1996.

 

3.  It is found that the respondent held a regular meeting on January 2, 1996 (hereinafter “the meeting”), which the complainant attended, and during which the respondent convened in executive session and discussed certain employment candidate resumes, including that of the complainant, provided in support of the applications for the position of “secretary/treasurer.”

 

4.  The complainant alleges that the respondent violated §§1-21(a) and 1-18a(e)(1), G.S., when it discussed her resume, and those of the other candidates, in executive session at the January 2, 1996 meeting without notice to the complainant and the other candidates whose resumes were discussed.

 

5.  Section 1-21(a), G.S., in material part, provides that “[t]he meetings of all public agencies, except executive sessions . . . shall be open to the public.”

 

Docket #FIC 1996-013                                                                                               Page 2

 

 

6.  Section 1-18a(e)(1), G.S., in material part, provides that “executive session” means:

 

discussion concerning the appointment, employment, performance, evaluation, health or dismissal of a public officer or employee, provided that such individual may require that discussion be held at an open meeting.

 

7.  It is concluded that discussion of the resumes of the individuals applying for the position of secretary/treasurer concerns the appointment or employment of a public employee within the meaning of §1-18a(e)(1), G.S., and consequently is a permissible purpose for an executive session.

 

8.  It is found that the complainant was present at the January 2, 1996 meeting and had access to the meeting’s agenda which listed the subject of the executive session as “DISCUSSION OF RESUMES PERSONNEL MATTERS.”

 

9.  It is also found that at the time the respondent determined to convene in executive session at its January 2, 1996 meeting, the complainant failed to assert her right to have the discussion of her resume conducted in open session.

 

10.  It is further found that the complainant failed to prove that any of the other employment candidates for the secretary/treasurer position wished to have their resumes discussed in open session.

 

11.  It is therefore concluded that the respondent did not violate §§1-18a(e)(1) or 1-21(a), G.S., with respect to the conduct of the executive session held at its January 2, 1996 meeting.

 

                The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

 

            1.  The complaint is hereby dismissed.

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of September 25, 1996.

 

                                                                                    __________________________

                                                                                    Elizabeth A. Leifert

Acting Clerk of the Commission


Docket # FIC 1996-013                                                                                              Page 3

 

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

Karen A. Massaro

8 Chris-Jon Circle

West Haven, CT 06516

 

 

Allingtown Board of Fire Commissioners

c/o  Louis Smith Votto, Esq.

415 Main Street

West Haven, CT 06516

 

 

 

                                                                                    __________________________

                                                                                    Elizabeth A. Leifert

                                                                                    Acting Clerk of the Commission