FREEDOM
OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF
THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a
Complaint by FINAL
DECISION
Daniel Kelley,
Complainant
against Docket
#FIC 1997-130
Mayor, City of Groton, and City
of Groton
Respondents January
28, 1998
The
above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on September 22, 1997, at
which time the complainant and the respondents appeared, stipulated to certain
facts and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.
After
consideration of the entire record, the following facts are found and
conclusions of law are reached:
1. The respondent mayor is a public agency
within the meaning of §1-18a(1),
G.S., (§1-18a(a),
G.S., prior to Oct. 1, 1997).
2. It is found that on April 8, 1997 the
complainant requested that the respondent mayor provide him with information
pertaining to certain charges to the police department reflected in the May and
October 1996 highway monthly reports under the category of “outside charges”. Specifically, the complainant requested the
following, hereinafter (“requested records”):
a. the amount charged the police department in
May 1996 for a vehicle storage parking area; the total expenses associated with
the vehicle storage parking area; and the location of the vehicle storage
parking area; and
b. the amount charged the police department in
October 1996 for installing an eleven space parking area; the total expenses
associated with installing the eleven space parking area; and the location of
the eleven space parking area.
3. The complainant also requested in his April
8, 1997 letter to the respondent mayor other information about costs associated
with the “muni building”, however, at the hearing on this matter, neither the
complainant nor the respondents addressed the “muni building” request. Accordingly, this decision is limited to the
evidence provided at the hearing concerning the records requested and described
in paragraph 2, of the findings, above.
4. It is found that the complainant’s April 8,
1997 request was received by the city of Groton (“city”) clerk’s office on
April 8, 1997 and later forwarded to the city’s department of finance.
5. It is found that neither the office of the
respondent mayor nor the city’s finance department responded to the
complainant’s request.
6. Having failed to receive the requested
records the complainant, by letter dated April 15, 1997 and filed on April 23,
1997, appealed to the Commission, alleging that the respondent mayor violated
the Freedom of Information Act by denying him access to the requested records.
7. It is found that records responsive to the
complainant’s request are maintained in the city’s department of finance and
such records are public records within the meaning of §1-18a(5),
G.S., (§1-18a(d),
G.S., prior to Oct. 1, 1997) and §1-19(a),
G.S.
8. It is found that the city’s finance director
compiled the records described in paragraph 7 of the findings, above, however,
neither his office nor the respondent mayor’s office contacted the complainant
to inform him that the records were ready and available.
9. It is found that as of the date of the
hearing on this matter, the records compiled and described in paragraph 8 of
the findings, above, are still in the city finance director’s desk.
10. It is found that the respondents failed to
provide the complainant with access to the requested records.
11. It is therefore, concluded that the
respondents violated §1-19(a),
G.S.
The
following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the
record concerning the above-captioned complaint:
1. Forthwith, the respondents shall provide the
complainant with a copy of the requested records, if such records have not yet
been provided.
2. Henceforth, the respondents shall strictly
comply with §1-19(a),
G.S.
3. The Commission notes the apparent strained
relationship between the complainant and the respondents and takes this
opportunity to suggest that they attempt to improve their communication in a
spirit of cooperation to avoid further complaints of this nature.
Approved
by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of
January 28, 1998.
_________________________
Doris V. Luetjen
Acting Clerk of the Commission
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE
FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS,
PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:
Daniel Kelley
48 Old Farms Road
Groton, CT 06340
Mayor, City of Groton; and City of Groton
c/o Peter Gianacoplos
Bartinik, Gianacoplos, Bates & Groton
100 Fort Hill Road
P.O. Box 942
Groton, CT 06340
__________________________
Doris V. Luetjen
Acting Clerk of the Commission
FIC1997-130/FD/tcg/01281998