The above-captioned matter was scheduled to be heard as a contested case on May 
5, 1998, at which time the complainant and the respondents appeared in order to present 
testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.

	At an informal conference prior to the May 5, 1998 hearing, the complainant and 
the respondents reached the terms of an agreement in resolution of this contested case.  

1)  The parties agreed that the respondents’ records indicate that they sent copies of 
certain requested records to the complainant in November of 1997, but that the 
complainant never received such copies; the parties further agreed that such copies were 
provided to the complainant at the informal conference between the parties prior to the 
scheduled May 5, 1998 hearing.  

2)  The parties agreed that non-compliance with the complainant’s request for records 
related to the calculation of his pension was due to the respondents’ genuine 
misunderstanding of the complainant’s request.  The parties agreed that the respondents 
will endeavor to assemble the requested records and information relative to the 
complainant’s pension calculations, and that the respondents will then promptly provide 
copies of such records and information to the complainant at no charge.  

3)  The parties agreed that the respondents will promptly provide to the complainant, at 
no charge, copies of records relative to the pension policies of the City of Hartford, as 
discussed by the parties at the informal conference prior to the scheduled May 5, 1998 
hearing in this matter.      

	Based upon this agreement, the complainant informed the Commission that he 
wished to withdraw his complaint in this matter. 

	The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of 
the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

	1.  The complaint is hereby dismissed.

	Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular 
meeting of June 10, 1998.

_________________________
Doris V. Luetjen
Acting Clerk of the Commission

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF 
EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO 
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR 
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

George W. Sicaras
c/o Atty. William A. Snider
280 Main Street
Wethersfield, CT 06109

Denise Nappier, Treasurer, City of Hartford; and City of Hartford
c/o Atty. Michael C. Collins
Office of the Corporation Counsel
550 Main Street
Hartford, CT 06103

__________________________
Doris V. Luetjen
Acting Clerk of the Commission

FIC1997-303/FD/tcg/06121998