FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

In the Matter of a Complaint by

FINAL DECISION

Joan Coe,

 

 

Complainants

 

 

against

 

Docket #FIC 1999-294

Superintendent of Schools,

Simsbury Public Schools,

 

 

Respondents

November 10, 1999

 

The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on August 26, 1999, at which time the complainant and the respondent appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint.  At the hearing on this matter, Joseph Grace, the subject of the records at issue in this matter, requested and was granted party status.

 

After consideration of the entire record, the following facts are found and conclusions of law are reached:

 

1.  The respondent is a public agency within the meaning of §1-200(1), G.S. [formerly §1-18a(1), G.S.].

 

2.  By letter dated June 13, 1999, the complainant requested that the respondent provide her with copies of several records concerning Simsbury Football Coach Joe Grace (hereinafter “Coach Grace”), including a reprimand.  The complainant stated that the subject material should include the investigation that was conducted pertaining to the incidents prior to and during the October 31, 1998 football game between Bloomfield and Simsbury High Schools.

 

3.  By letter dated June 21, 1999 and filed July 2, 1999, the complainant appealed to the Commission alleging that the respondent had not provided her with a copy of the reprimand of Coach Grace and requesting that the Commission undergo an in camera inspection of Coach Grace’s entire personnel file to determine what information is subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information (hereinafter “FOI”) Act.

 

4.  It is found that the respondent does not maintain a written reprimand for Coach Grace concerning the incidents referenced in paragraph 2, above.  However, in June 1999, following the respondent’s receipt of a written complaint letter from a parent concerning the incidents referenced in paragraph 2, above, and an investigation thereof, Coach Grace was issued an amended performance evaluation pertaining to his coaching for the 1998-1999 academic year, along with a typed attachment indicating that the evaluation had been modified, which records are maintained by the respondent.

 

5.  At the hearing on this matter, the parties agreed that the issue before the Commission is whether the amended performance evaluation and attachment, described in paragraph 4, above, to the extent they document or relate to the incidents referenced in paragraph 2, above, is subject to disclosure.  The complainant indicated that she had either received all of the other records requested in her June 13, 1999 letter of request or that she was no longer interested in obtaining them.

 

6.  It is found that the requested records are public records within the meaning of §§1-200(5) and 1-210(a), G.S. [formerly §§1-18a(5) and 1-19(a), G.S.].

 

7.  At the hearing on this matter, the respondent and Coach Grace maintained that the subject amended performance evaluation and attachment is exempt from disclosure pursuant to §10-151c, G.S.

 

8.  Section 1-210(a), G.S., [formerly §1-19(a), G.S.] provides in relevant part that:

 

Except as otherwise provided by any federal law or state statute, all records maintained or kept on file by any public agency…shall be public records and every person shall have the right to inspect such records promptly during regular office or business hours or to receive a copy of such records in accordance with the provisions of section 1-212 [formerly §1-15, G.S.].

 

9.  Section 10-151c, G.S., provides, in relevant part, that:

 

[a]ny records maintained or kept on file by any local or regional board of education which are records of teacher performance and evaluation shall not be deemed public records and shall not be subject to the provisions of §1-210 [formerly §1-19, G.S.], provided that any teacher may consent in writing to the release of his records by a board of education.

 

10.  After the hearing on this matter, the respondent submitted the subject records, along with Coach Grace’s original evaluation that was completed in December of 1998, to the Commission for an in camera inspection.

 

11.  It is found that Coach Grace is a teacher within the Simsbury Public Schools system.

 

12.  After conducting an in camera inspection of the subject records, it is found that Coach Grace’s performance evaluation was amended in a general manner in June 1999 and that there is no reference, either in the amended evaluation or the short attachment, to specific incidents that resulted in the change to the evaluation or to disciplinary action.

 

13.  It is further found that the respondent issued a public statement detailing the investigation conducted concerning the incidents referenced in paragraph 2, above, that is far more specific than the information that is reflected in the subject records.

 

14.  It is further found that the subject records constitute records of “teacher performance and evaluation” within the meaning of §10-151c, G.S.

 

15.  It is concluded under the facts of this case, that the subject records are exempt from disclosure pursuant to §10-151c, G.S., and that the respondent did not violate the disclosure provisions of §§1-210(a) and 1-212(a), G.S. [formerly §§1-19(a) and 1-15(a) G.S., respectively], by failing to disclose such records to the complainant following her June 13, 1999 request.

 

 

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

 

1.  The complaint is hereby dismissed.

 

 

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of

November 10, 1999.

 

 

_________________________

Melanie R. Balfour

Acting Clerk of the Commission


PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

 

Joan Coe,

26 Whitcomb Drive

Simsbury, CT  06070

 

Superintendent of Schools, Simsbury Public Schools

c/o Atty. Thomas N. Sullivan

Sullivan, Schoen, Campane & Connon, LLC

646 Prospect Avenue

Hartford, CT  06105-4286

 

Joseph Grace

c/o Atty. William J. Dolan

21 Oak Street, Suite 500

Hartford, CT  06106-8001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

__________________________

Melanie R. Balfour

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

FIC1999-294/FD/mrb/11121999