FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

The above-captioned matter was scheduled to be heard as a contested case on October 17, 2003, at which time neither the complainant nor the respondent appeared.  The complainant did not attempt to notify the Commission of his desire to withdraw the complaint until Saturday, October 18, 2003, at which time he sent an e-mail to that effect.

 

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

 

1.  The complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

 

 

 

 

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of December 10, 2003.

 

 

___________________________________

Ann B. Gimmartino

Acting Clerk of the Commission

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

Edward A. Peruta

38 Parish Road

Rocky Hill, CT  06067

 

Arthur Spada, Commissioner,

State of Connecticut,

Department of Public Safety

c/o Matthew B. Beizer, Esq.

Assistant Attorney General

110 Sherman Street

Hartford, CT  06105

 

 

___________________________________

Ann B. Gimmartino

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

FIC/2003-053/FD/abg/12/12/2003