FREEDOM
OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
In the Matter of a Complaint by | FINAL DECISION | ||
Bradshaw Smith, | |||
Complainant | |||
against | Docket #FIC 2005-251 | ||
Arthur L. Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District, |
|||
Respondent | September 28, 2005 | ||
The above-captioned matter was scheduled to be heard on August 17, 2005, at which time the respondent appeared, however, the complainant failed to appear to prosecute the complaint. For purposes of hearing, the following matters were consolidated with the above-captioned case: contested case docket #FIC 2005-223, Bradshaw Smith v. Arthur L. Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; William D. Chiodo, Chairman, Personnel Committee, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District; FIC 2005-048, Bradshaw Smith v. Arthur L. Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; William D. Chiodo, Chairman, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District; FIC 2005-252, Bradshaw Smith v. William D. Chiodo, Chairman, Greater Hartford Transit District; Arthur Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District; FIC 2005-253, Bradshaw Smith v. William D. Chiodo, Chairman, Personnel Committee, Greater Hartford Transit District; Arthur Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District; FIC 2005-279, Bradshaw Smith v. Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District; FIC 2005-289, Bradshaw Smith v. Arthur L. Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; William D. Chiodo, Chairman, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District; FIC 2005-290, Bradshaw Smith v. Arthur L. Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; William D. Chiodo, Chairman, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District; and FIC 2005-291, Bradshaw Smith v. Arthur L. Handman, Executive Director, Greater Hartford Transit District; William D. Chiodo, Chairman, Greater Hartford Transit District; and Greater Hartford Transit District.
The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:
1. The complaint is hereby dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of September 28, 2005.
________________________________
Petrea A. Jones
Acting Clerk of the Commission
PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:
Bradshaw Smith
23 Ludlow Road
Windsor, CT 06095
Arthur L. Handman, Executive
Director, Greater Hartford Transit
District
c/o Michael Shea, Esq.
Day, Berry & Howard LLP
CityPlace I, 185 Asylum Street
Hartford, CT 06103-3499
___________________________________
Petrea A. Jones
Acting Clerk of the Commission
FIC/2005-251FD/paj/10/5/2005