FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

 

The above-captioned matter was scheduled to be heard as a contested case on September 28, 2009 at 9:30 a.m., at which time the respondents appeared but the complainant failed to appear.

 

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

 

1.  The complaint is dismissed for failure to prosecute.

 

 

 

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its regular meeting of October 28, 2009.

 

 

____________________________

S. Wilson

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

 

 

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

 

Denise Forgione  

161 Coachmans Drive

Southbury, CT 06488

 

Legal Advisor, Legal Affairs Unit,

State of Connecticut,

Department of Public Safety; and

State of Connecticut,

Department of Public Safety

C/o Lynn D. Wittenbrink, Esq. and
Stephen R. Sarnoski, Esq.

Assistant Attorneys General

Attorney General’s Office

110 Sherman Street

Hartford, CT 06105

 

 

____________________________

S. Wilson

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

FIC/2009-349FD/sw/11/2/2009