FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION
OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

 

The above-captioned matter was heard as a contested case on July 16, 2010, at which time the complainant and the respondents appeared, stipulated to certain facts and presented testimony, exhibits and argument on the complaint. 

 

At the conclusion of the parties’ presentation of testimony and exhibits, the complainant indicated on the record that he wished to withdraw his complaint.

 

The following order by the Commission is hereby recommended on the basis of the record concerning the above-captioned complaint:

 

1.  The complaint is hereby dismissed.

 

2.  The Commission commends the parties on having reached a settlement in this matter without full adjudication.

 

Approved by Order of the Freedom of Information Commission at its special meeting of January 28, 2011.

 

__________________________

Cynthia A. Cannata

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

 

 

 

 

Docket #FIC 2010-253                                                                                               Page 2

 

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 4-180(c), G.S., THE FOLLOWING ARE THE NAMES OF EACH PARTY AND THE MOST RECENT MAILING ADDRESS, PROVIDED TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, OF THE PARTIES OR THEIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.

 

THE PARTIES TO THIS CONTESTED CASE ARE:

 

Douglas Thielen

9 Pheasant Drive

New Fairfield, CT  06812

 

First Selectman, Town of New Fairfield; and Town of New Fairfield

c/o Gary R. Brochu, Esq.

Shipman & Goodwin, LLP

One Constitution Plaza

Hartford, CT  06103

 

 

 

____________________________

Cynthia A. Cannata

Acting Clerk of the Commission

 

 

 

 

 

FIC/2010-253/FD/cac/2/3/2011